Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 22 results ...
Bingham, E, Gibson, G E and Asmar, M E (2018) Measuring User Perceptions of Popular Transportation Project Delivery Methods Using Least Significant Difference Intervals and Multiple Range Tests. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Chang, C and Yu, S (2018) Three-Variance Approach for Updating Earned Value Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
de la Garza, J M and Pishdad-Bozorgi, P (2018) Workflow Process Model for Flash Track Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
El-adaway, I H, Abotaleb, I S, Eid, M S, May, S, Netherton, L and Vest, J (2018) Contract administration guidelines for public infrastructure projects in the United States and Saudi Arabia: comparative analysis approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06), 04018031.
Guo, H, Yu, Y, Ding, Q and Skitmore, M (2018) Image-and-Skeleton-Based Parameterized Approach to Real-Time Identification of Construction Workers’ Unsafe Behaviors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Ham, N, Moon, S, Kim, J and Kim, J (2018) Economic Analysis of Design Errors in BIM-Based High-Rise Construction Projects: Case Study of Haeundae L Project. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Han, Y, Li, Y, Taylor, J E and Zhong, J (2018) Characteristics and Evolution of Innovative Collaboration Networks in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction: Study of National Prize-Winning Projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Kosonen, H K and Kim, A A (2018) Mental Model Approach to Wastewater Treatment Plant Project Delivery during Emergency Response. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Kwon, N, Song, K, Lee, H, Kim, J and Park, M (2018) Construction Noise Risk Assessment Model Focusing on Construction Equipment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Liu, D, Lu, W and Niu, Y (2018) Extended Technology-Acceptance Model to Make Smart Construction Systems Successful. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Liu, X, Song, Y, Yi, W, Wang, X and Zhu, J (2018) Comparing the Random Forest with the Generalized Additive Model to Evaluate the Impacts of Outdoor Ambient Environmental Factors on Scaffolding Construction Productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Liu, Z, Wang, H and Li, H (2018) Model of Equipment Sharing between Contractors on Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Nzabonimpa, J D and Hong, W (2018) Novel Precast Erection Method of Interlocking Mechanical Joints Using Couplers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Rahimi, Y, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R, Iranmanesh, S H and Vaez-Alaei, M (2018) Hybrid Approach to Construction Project Risk Management with Simultaneous FMEA/ISO 31000/Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Optimization Study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Raoufi, M and Fayek, A R (2018) Key Moderators of the Relationship between Construction Crew Motivation and Performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Shaofeng, L, Jincai, F, Pinghua, Z and Xiang, L (2018) Stability Analysis of Two Parallel Closely Spaced Tunnels Based on Convergence–Confinement Principle. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Sherratt, F, Welfare, K, Hallowell, M and Hoque Tania, M (2018) Legalized Recreational Marijuana: Safety, Ethical, and Legal Perceptions of the Workforce. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Vaux, J S and Kirk, W M (2018) Relationship Conflict in Construction Management: Performance and Productivity Problem. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Walters, J P, Kaminsky, J and Huepe, C (2018) Factors Influencing Household Solar Adoption in Santiago, Chile. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Yoon, S, Kang, K, Yoon, Y, Hastak, M and Ji, R (2018) Systematic Decision-Making Process for Composite Pavement Maintenance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
Yu, J and Leung, M (2018) Structural Stakeholder Model in Public Engagement for Construction Development Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: Interests; Power; Public engagement; Stakeholder; Structural equation model;
- ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001462
- Abstract:
Construction development projects are often complicated and influence multiple stakeholders with different requirements and interests. Public engagement (PE) has emerged as a prerequisite for collecting stakeholders’ opinions and involving them in the planning and decision making of construction development projects. It is not easy to identify and manage stakeholders in PE because different stakeholders possess different types of power and interests that have the potential to dramatically affect stakeholder behaviors and final project outcomes. However, the effects of stakeholder attributes (i.e., power and interest) on stakeholder management in PE and final PE outcomes have been insufficiently studied. This study aimed to investigate the complicated relationships between stakeholders’ power, interests, and PE outcomes through a questionnaire survey. An integrated model for stakeholder power, interest, and PE outcomes was developed using a structural equation model. The results showed that different forms of power and interest influenced final PE outcomes either directly or indirectly. PE organizers are encouraged to directly involve project teams, experts, and reputable stakeholders in the PE process and allow the media and nongovernmental organizations to monitor the decision-making process. The findings of this study will contribute to stakeholder management for PE in construction projects by developing a structural model that can be adopted to identify stakeholder power and interests and engage appropriate stakeholders in the decision-making process. It is expected to improve PE outcomes and enhance stakeholder satisfaction for construction development projects.
Zhao, T, Liu, W, Zhang, L and Zhou, W (2018) Retracted: Cluster Analysis of Risk Factors from Near-Miss and Accident Reports in Tunneling Excavation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(06).